Augustine and the Pelagian Controversy

4.4/5 ( ratings)

Thank you for choosing CrossReach Publications!

Please see the description below, but first our promises to you:

This edition includes all the original footnotes. Others do not. Our goal is to bring you high quality Christian publications at reasonable and affordable prices. Therefore all of our works are complete and unabridged unless specifically stated otherwise, which means that unlike some other independent publications you get what you see and pay for. No unpleasant surprises.

We endeavour to bring you updated editions of classic works. Therefore this work is not a scan, but is a completely digitized version of the original.

Unlike, many other independently published works, our publications are easy to read. Therefore you won't find illegible, faded, poor quality photocopies here. Neither will you find poorly done OCR versions of those faded scans either, with illegible “words” that contain all kinds of strange characters like £, %, &, etc. Our publications have all been looked over and corrected by the human eye.

We can't promise perfection, but we're sure gonna try!

If you have any problems or just want to get in touch then drop us an email: [email protected] Please note this book is double-columned, 11 pt font, 8.5"x11" . We chose these dimensions for economic reasons and have, as always, passed on the savings to you. At the standard 6"x9" size this book would have cost at least 50% more than it does now. We would be very happy to receive your opinions on this via email.
Introduction:It was inevitable that the energy of the Church in intellectually realizing and defining its doctrines in relation to one another, should first be directed towards the objective side of Christian truth. The chief controversies of the first four centuries and the resulting definitions of doctrine, concerned the nature of God and the person of Christ; and it was not until these theological and Christological questions were well upon their way to final settlement, that the Church could turn its attention to the more subjective side of truth. Meanwhile she bore in her bosom a full recognition, side by side, of the freedom of the will, the evil consequences of the fall, and the necessity of divine grace for salvation. Individual writers, or even the several sections of the Church, might exhibit a tendency to throw emphasis on one or another of the elements that made up this deposit of faith that was the common inheritance of all. The East, for instance, laid especial stress on free will: and the West dwelt more pointedly on the ruin of the human race and the absolute need of God’s grace for salvation. But neither did the Eastern theologians forget the universal sinfulness and need of redemption, or the necessity, for the realization of that redemption, of God’s gracious influences; nor did those of the West deny the self-determination or accountability of men. All the elements of the composite doctrine of man were everywhere confessed; but they were variously emphasized, according to the temper of the writers or the controversial demands of the times. Such a state of affairs, however, was an invitation to heresy, and a prophecy of controversy; just as the simultaneous confession of the unity of God and the Deity of Christ, or of the Deity and the humanity of Christ, inevitably carried in its train a series of heresies and controversies, until the definitions of the doctrines of the Trinity and of the person of Christ were complete.