The Pilhar Lectures: No. 101: Evolutionary Development & Handedness

0/5 ( ratings)

In his second presentation, Evolutionary Development & Handedness, No. 101 in the Pilhar Lecture Series, Helmut Pilhar leads us through a summary of our organism's evolutionary development, as seen from our three embryonic germ layers, i.e., four tissue types, and their increasing functional complexity. In the second half, Helmut explains biological handedness or laterality and ways to determine someone's handedness. In doing so, he goes into a detailed explanation of our partner-mother/child perception. In turn, this shows us how handedness generally determines the local appearance of symptoms and we learn about the innervation crossovers between our body halves and each brain level's relays . Lastly, Helmut provides some further examples of deducing handedness in tricky situations.Helmut Pilhar could be considered Dr. Hamer’s “right hand man,” as he lectured for him all over Europe for decades, tirelessly spreading Germanic Healing Knowledge to thousands of interested people. Helmut eventually emigrated to Paraguay and continued to lecture online and sell materials thorough his germanischeheilkunde.at.Shortly before his death in 2022, Helmut’s website was hijacked by people working for him. Despite filing international lawsuits, Helmut was unable to regain control of his website. In response, Helmut decided to release all his teaching materials to the public, essentially making them public domain. I downloaded all these materials at that time.If you look online, you can find these lectures and transcripts freely available in German. However, in English, this information is still only available at unnecessarily high prices on his hijacked website, the proceeds presumeably going to the hijackers. Therefore, I decided to make an affordable, indexed text version of this series available to the broader English-speaking public. I hope this is in line with Helmut’s wishes.Mind To a contemporary English reader, Helmut can be considered “old-fashioned,” and he peppers his lectures with a lot of his own side commentary as he goes along. His asides are definitely not politically correct. In his defense, he would probably say that nature and biology aren’t politically correct either and he’s just calling it like he sees it. I have left all his commentary to speak for itself as it appears throughout the lecture.