Read Anywhere and on Any Device!

Subscribe to Read | $0.00

Join today and start reading your favorite books for Free!

Create Free Account

Quick and Easy Sign Up!

It takes less then 1 minute to sign up, then you can enjoy Unlimited eBooks.

Sign Up Browse

Popular Genres

Read Anywhere and on Any Device!

  • Download on iOS
  • Download on Android
  • Download on iOS

Proposals to Reform "Holds" in the Senate

Proposals to Reform "Holds" in the Senate

Walter J. Oleszek
0/5 ( ratings)
Read Download
“Holds” are an informal senatorial custom unrecognized in Senate rules or precedents. They allow Senators to give notice to their respective party leader that certain measures or matters should not be brought up on the floor. Implicit in the practice is that a Senator will object to taking up a bill or nomination on which he or she has placed a hold. The Senate’s majority leader, who exercises primary responsibility for determining the chamber’s agenda, traditionally in consultation with the minority leader, is the final arbiter as to whether and for how long he will honor a hold placed by a Member or group of lawmakers.

The origin of holds has been lost in the mists of history. Their ostensible purpose is to provide advance notice to Senators as to when a measure or matter, in which they have expressed an interest by placing holds, is slated to be called up by the majority leader. However, since the 1970s, holds came into greater prominence in the Senate as more Members began to employ holds as a way to try to accomplish their policy or political objectives.

In a Senate with a large and complex workload, and more dependent than ever on unanimous consent agreements to process its expanding business, holds provide significant leverage to Members who wish to delay action on legislation or nominations. Given the heightened potency of holds, there have been many initiatives over the years to reform the Senate’s hold practices.

This report examines, over a more than three decade period, a wide range of proposals to reform holds. In general, the objective of these recommendations is not to abolish holds but to infuse more accountability, uniformity, and transparency in their use and to make it clear that holds are not a veto on the majority leader’s prerogative of calling up measures or matters. The historical record underscores that it has been difficult to revise a practice, now a regular feature of the Senate’s workways, that provides parliamentary influence and leverage to every Senator. The reform proposals examined are as follows:

Impose time limits
Abolish holds
Uniform procedure for holds
No indefinite, or permanent, holds
Prohibit blanket holds
End secret holds
Require more than one Senator to place a hold Permit a privileged resolution to terminate holds Restrict filibuster opportunities
Determination by majority leader to proceed

This report will be revised and expanded as events warrant.
Language
English
Pages
20
Format
Kindle Edition
Publisher
Congressional Research Service
Release
December 20, 2007

Proposals to Reform "Holds" in the Senate

Walter J. Oleszek
0/5 ( ratings)
Read Download
“Holds” are an informal senatorial custom unrecognized in Senate rules or precedents. They allow Senators to give notice to their respective party leader that certain measures or matters should not be brought up on the floor. Implicit in the practice is that a Senator will object to taking up a bill or nomination on which he or she has placed a hold. The Senate’s majority leader, who exercises primary responsibility for determining the chamber’s agenda, traditionally in consultation with the minority leader, is the final arbiter as to whether and for how long he will honor a hold placed by a Member or group of lawmakers.

The origin of holds has been lost in the mists of history. Their ostensible purpose is to provide advance notice to Senators as to when a measure or matter, in which they have expressed an interest by placing holds, is slated to be called up by the majority leader. However, since the 1970s, holds came into greater prominence in the Senate as more Members began to employ holds as a way to try to accomplish their policy or political objectives.

In a Senate with a large and complex workload, and more dependent than ever on unanimous consent agreements to process its expanding business, holds provide significant leverage to Members who wish to delay action on legislation or nominations. Given the heightened potency of holds, there have been many initiatives over the years to reform the Senate’s hold practices.

This report examines, over a more than three decade period, a wide range of proposals to reform holds. In general, the objective of these recommendations is not to abolish holds but to infuse more accountability, uniformity, and transparency in their use and to make it clear that holds are not a veto on the majority leader’s prerogative of calling up measures or matters. The historical record underscores that it has been difficult to revise a practice, now a regular feature of the Senate’s workways, that provides parliamentary influence and leverage to every Senator. The reform proposals examined are as follows:

Impose time limits
Abolish holds
Uniform procedure for holds
No indefinite, or permanent, holds
Prohibit blanket holds
End secret holds
Require more than one Senator to place a hold Permit a privileged resolution to terminate holds Restrict filibuster opportunities
Determination by majority leader to proceed

This report will be revised and expanded as events warrant.
Language
English
Pages
20
Format
Kindle Edition
Publisher
Congressional Research Service
Release
December 20, 2007

More books from Walter J. Oleszek

Congressional Procedures and the Policy Process

3.7/5 ( ratings)

Congress and Its Members

3.6/5 ( ratings)

Congressional Lawmaking: A Perspective On Secrecy and Transparency

3.6/5 ( ratings)

Congress and Its Members

3.6/5 ( ratings)

Congress and Its Members

3.6/5 ( ratings)

Congress and Its Members + Congress Reconsidered

3.6/5 ( ratings)

Congress and Its Members

3.6/5 ( ratings)

Congress and Its Members

3.6/5 ( ratings)

Congressional Oversight: An Overview

3.6/5 ( ratings)

Congress and Its Members

3.6/5 ( ratings)

Congress and Its Members, 12th Edition

3.6/5 ( ratings)

Congress Under Fire

3.6/5 ( ratings)

Congressional Committees and Party Leadership: Who Controls the Congressional Agenda ~ Audio CD (Capitol Learning Audio Course)

3.6/5 ( ratings)

Rate this book!

Write a review?

loader