Read Anywhere and on Any Device!

Subscribe to Read | $0.00

Join today and start reading your favorite books for Free!

Read Anywhere and on Any Device!

  • Download on iOS
  • Download on Android
  • Download on iOS

Nature in Common?: Environmental Ethics and the Contested Foundations of Environmental Policy

Nature in Common?: Environmental Ethics and the Contested Foundations of Environmental Policy

Ben A. Minteer
0/5 ( ratings)
This important book brings together leading environmental thinkers to debate a central conflict within environmental philosophy: should we appreciate nature mainly for its ability to advance our interests or should we respect it as having a good of its own, apart from any contribution to human well-being? Specifically, the fourteen essays collected here discuss the OC convergence hypothesisOCO put forth by Bryan NortonOCoa controversial thesis in environmental ethics about the policy implications of moral arguments for environmental protection. Historically influential essays are joined with newly-commissioned essays to provide the first sustained attempt to reconcile two long-opposed positions. Bryan Norton himself offers the bookOCOs closing essay.

a

This seminal volume contains contributions from some of the most respected scholars in the field, including Donald Brown, J. Baird Callicott, Andrew Light, Holmes Rolston III, Laura Westra, and many others. Although "Nature in Common?" will be especially useful for students and professionals studying environmental ethics and philosophy, it will engage any reader who is concerned about the philosophies underlying contemporary environmental policies.
Language
English
Pages
312
Format
ebook
Publisher
Not Avail
Release
June 30, 2014
ISBN
1592137059
ISBN 13
9781592137053

Nature in Common?: Environmental Ethics and the Contested Foundations of Environmental Policy

Ben A. Minteer
0/5 ( ratings)
This important book brings together leading environmental thinkers to debate a central conflict within environmental philosophy: should we appreciate nature mainly for its ability to advance our interests or should we respect it as having a good of its own, apart from any contribution to human well-being? Specifically, the fourteen essays collected here discuss the OC convergence hypothesisOCO put forth by Bryan NortonOCoa controversial thesis in environmental ethics about the policy implications of moral arguments for environmental protection. Historically influential essays are joined with newly-commissioned essays to provide the first sustained attempt to reconcile two long-opposed positions. Bryan Norton himself offers the bookOCOs closing essay.

a

This seminal volume contains contributions from some of the most respected scholars in the field, including Donald Brown, J. Baird Callicott, Andrew Light, Holmes Rolston III, Laura Westra, and many others. Although "Nature in Common?" will be especially useful for students and professionals studying environmental ethics and philosophy, it will engage any reader who is concerned about the philosophies underlying contemporary environmental policies.
Language
English
Pages
312
Format
ebook
Publisher
Not Avail
Release
June 30, 2014
ISBN
1592137059
ISBN 13
9781592137053

Rate this book!

Write a review?

loader