Subscribe to Read | $0.00
Join today and start reading your favorite books for Free!
Quick and Easy Sign Up!
It takes less then 1 minute to sign up, then you can enjoy Unlimited eBooks.
Join today and start reading your favorite books for Free!
Quick and Easy Sign Up!
It takes less then 1 minute to sign up, then you can enjoy Unlimited eBooks.
Read Anywhere and on Any Device!
Rate this book!
Write a review?
در این کتاب مایکل سندل به بررسی لیبرالیسم وظیفه‌گرایانه‌ی رالز که آن را بر مبنای عدالت بنا میکند می‌پردازد و نشان می‌دهد که چگونه مفروضات عدالت اصول فردگرایانه لیبرالیسم را مختل میکند.
إن المجتمعات الليبرالية تقام على أسس سياسية وما ينطلق منها أخلاقيًا في خدمة السياسة، ولكن كيف يمكن تأسيس مجتمع أخلاقي دون فرض "رؤية مسبقة للحياة الخيرة" ودون الإخلال بأسس المذهب الليبرالي أيضًا؟ هذا السؤال هو محور الكتاب التي يقلبها وينتقدها المؤلف مايكل سانديل، أستاذ العلوم السياسية في جامعة هارفرد، بين نظرية رولز ونوزيك وكانت للعدالة.بعيدًا عن تسطيح الليبرالية واستعمالها الخاطئ لتبرير رغبات طبيعية في الحياة الهنيئة يقارن المؤلف أبسط الموضوعات الليبرالية تدريجيًا من حرية الرأي والحرية الدينية إ...
Got 10 or so pages in, realized that I wasn't up to the work that was going to be required to read this book. Not indecipherable but I guess I'm getting a little lazy.
Reconstrucción la de teoría de justicia de Rawls. La mejor parte es la crítica al "yo" presupuesto en la posición original.
A thorough critique and argument for the inadequacy of Rawlsian liberalism in support of Rawls' justice as fairness principle.
A brilliant attack on John Rawls "A Theory of Justice".
شاید بتوان گفت نظریه عدالت جان رالز یکی از مهم‌ترین نظریات متاخر از لیبرالیسم هست و البته کتاب لیبرالیسم و منتقدان آن (که در ویرایش دوم به لیبرالیسم و محدودیت‌های عدالت تغییر نام داد) یکی از مهم‌ترین نقدها بر نظریه عدالت رالز است. در واقع اگرچه رالز قصد داشت لیبرالیسم را دوباره نجات دهد اما به نظر می‌رسد در این مسیر چندان موفق نبوده است. یکی از ایده‌های خلاقانه‌ای که رالز مطرح میکند ایده حجاب نادانی است. این ایده می‌گوید که قانونگذار پیش از آنکه قانون بگذارد باید در حجابی از جهل به سر ببرد و هی...
Very few challenges to Rawls are interesting. This one is, althouhgh I fell it is not really a challenge, but more a situational extension. Rawls helps us set the etalon, Sandel helps us think it through how we can get there.
I'm studying Public Choice and I found this book really useful for articulating the main reason I find that approach problematic. There isn't enough emphasis on debate and engagement. Towards the end of the book, in the part that updates the argument following 'Political Liberalism' Sandel sums it up perfectly for me "Whether a moral or political controversy reflects reasonable but incompatible conceptions of the good, or whether it can be resolved by due reflection and deliberation, can only be...
المناقشة شيقة..الاعتراضات لها جانبها من الصحة،،بنهاية قراءة هذا الكتاب...زادت عندي الرؤية الشاملة للعدالة..ولازلت مؤمنا بالليبرالية كحل مثالي لتحقيقها..ليبرالية تتكيف مع الواقع .. وتتقبل النقد..لانه حرية:)
Definitely need to have read Rawls first to have any chance on this.
The basis of the Rawls/Sandel debate is an interrogation of the relationship between justice and good. One wonders whether a society's principles of justice can be neutral in relation to the contradictory moral, religious and cultural conceptions that coexist in that society. There are two ways of conceiving this neutrality:(1) The idea that individuals have fundamental rights whose respect takes precedence over the general welfare (Kant, Nozick);(2) The idea that the justification of the princi...
Michael Sandel's Liberalism and the Limits of Justice is an argument against Classical Liberalism, at least as Classical Liberalism is expressed in the political philosophy of John Rawls. Rawls, in his book A Theory of Justice, argued that the role of government is social justice. He defended the view that there are certain basic freedoms that everyone should respect regardless of the person and that cannot be violated. He also claimed that any social inequality that arises should be allowed pro...
